euphemism

language
print Print
Please select which sections you would like to print:
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Share
Share to social media
URL
https://mainten.top/art/euphemism
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

euphemism, a mild or indirect word or phrase used in place of a statement or word that is considered disagreeable or offensive. The word euphemism originated in the mid-17th century from the Greek word euphēmismos, which means “use auspicious words,” with the prefix eu- meaning “good,” or “well,” and the word phēmē meaning “speech.”

Situational usage

Euphemisms are most commonly used in situations in which a speaker wants to avoid talking directly about certain topics or to mitigate their severity. Topics that can be addressed indirectly through the use of euphemism include death, sex, body parts, and bodily functions. Examples of avoidance euphemisms include “seeing a man about a horse” for going to the bathroom, “buying the farm” for dying, and “rolling in the hay” for having sexual intercourse.

Topics whose brutality or cruelty can be mitigated through the use of euphemism include economic and social injustices, war crimes, and death. Examples of mitigation euphemisms include “letting someone go” for firing an employee, “collateral damage” for civilian casualties, and “in a better place” for being dead.

Types

  • Abstraction euphemisms create new scenarios to refer to unpleasant or embarrassing situations by abstracting well-known facts; for example, “casualties of war” for dead or wounded people.
  • Indirection euphemisms change the focus of unpleasant or embarrassing situations by using words that direct attention to a different thing; for example, “sleeping together” for having sexual intercourse.
  • Litotes downplay topics by using understatements that emphasize the exact opposite of the topic’s meaning; for example, “not exactly starving” for “very hungry.”
  • Mispronunciation alters the sounds in explicit words to keep language appropriate while still expressing frustration; for example, “darn” for “damn” and “cripes” for “Christ.”
  • Modification softens harsh topics by converting a noun to an adjective, for example, “he has foolish beliefs” instead of “he is a fool.”
  • Personification allows uncomfortable topics to be discussed more easily by giving them a personal name rather than a technical name; for example, “a visit from Aunt Flo” when referring to menstruation.
Laura Payne