voter suppression Article

voter suppression summary

verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Share
Share to social media
URL
https://mainten.top/summary/voter-suppression
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

External Websites

Learn about the practice of voter suppression in the U.S.

Below is the article summary. For the full article, see voter suppression.

voter suppression, In U.S. history and politics, any legal or extralegal measure or strategy whose purpose or practical effect is to reduce voting, or registering to vote, by members of a targeted racial group, political party, or religious community. The overwhelming majority of victims of voter suppression have been African Americans. Voter suppression has been practiced in the U.S. since at least the end of Reconstruction (1877), the brief period after the Civil War during which African Americans in the former Confederate states were able to exercise their newly won civil rights, including the right to vote, under the protection of federal troops authorized by a Republican-dominated Congress. During the 1870s Southern Democrats, who opposed civil rights for Blacks, regained control of their state legislatures and subsequently passed laws and state-constitutional amendments that effectively disenfranchised almost all Black voters and imposed a rigid system of racial segregation, Jim Crow, that lasted until the mid-20th century. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act (VRA) of 1965 greatly increased voter registration and voting among Blacks in the South. The latter legislation, however, was essentially made unenforceable by two U.S. Supreme Court decisions, Shelby County v. Holder (2013) and Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (2021). Following Shelby County, several Republican-led states implemented voter suppression measures that had been or would have been blocked under the VRA, including strict voter ID laws, the closure or relocation of polling stations in predominantly African American neighbourhoods, reductions in early-voting periods, burdensome requirements for obtaining or submitting absentee ballots, restrictions or outright bans on voter registration drives, the elimination of same-day voter registration, and large-scale purges of voter rolls. In the wake of the presidential campaign and election of 2020, which coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, several Republican-controlled state legislatures rescinded changes in electoral procedures that had been implemented to protect voters from infection with the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, the cause of COVID-19. The Republican legislation additionally strengthened previous voter suppression measures and introduced significant changes in election administration that undermined the independence of state and local election officials. Another political strategy that is sometimes treated as a form of voter suppression is racial or partisan gerrymandering (the drawing of electoral districts by state legislatures in such a way as to dilute the voting power of members of a certain racial group or political party), though it does not specifically prevent any person from voting or registering to vote. In 2019 the Supreme Court ruled (in Rucho v. Common Cause) that partisan gerrymandering is a “political question” that is beyond the power of the federal courts to address.