First French Empire
First French Empire, historical empire established on May 18, 1804, with the creation of Napoleon I as “emperor of the French.” The Napoleonic empire persisted until the restoration of Louis XVIII on May 3, 1814. It enjoyed a brief resurrection during the Hundred Days (March 20, 1815–July 8, 1815) but concluded with Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo, his final exile to St. Helena, and the second restoration of Louis XVIII to the throne.
Napoleon used this specific wording for a number of reasons. First, it signaled a break with the ancien régime and the surviving Bourbons, as “king of France” was a title that had been associated with the country’s Capetian rulers for hundreds of years. It also affirmed that the constitutional changes implemented by the Revolutionary government and the Consulate would remain in place; “emperor of the French” was a political office created by legislative action of the Senate of the French Republic. Finally, it emphasized Napoleon’s personal connection to his subjects, preserving—at least in appearance—the notion that he ruled by popular mandate.
The foundations of empire
The path from revolution to empire was far from direct, and Napoleon won separate but complementary victories in the political, military, and diplomatic spheres to achieve that result. The Coup of 18–19 Brumaire (November 9–10, 1799) consolidated power in the Consulate, a triumvirate consisting of Napoleon, Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès, and Pierre-Roger Ducos. Sieyès was the architect of the Constitution of the Year VIII, the legislative framework that created the Consulate, and he had envisioned an executive that would be checked by an elaborate balance of powers. Napoleon, as first consul, would suffer no such constraints. Sieyès soon found himself outmaneuvered, and Napoleon secured for himself the last word on all policies and appointments. Under the guise of republicanism, Napoleon transformed the constitution into an instrument of autocracy. Submitted to a plebiscite in February 1800, the new constitution won an overwhelming majority.
The Battle of Marengo and the end of the war with Austria
On the military front, the Battle of Marengo (June 14, 1800) was of special importance, as it consolidated the reputation of Bonaparte at a time when republican opposition was gathering strength. As Lucien Bonaparte later remarked, if Marengo had been lost, the Bonaparte family would have been proscribed. Napoleon saw the strategic importance of Switzerland, from which he would be free to outflank the Austrian armies either in Germany or in Italy as he might see fit. His past successes made him choose Italy. Taking his army across the Great St. Bernard Pass before the snow had melted, he appeared unexpectedly behind the Austrian army which was besieging Genoa.
In spite of this impressive tactical achievement, the battle was nearly lost when a miscalculation about the disposition of Austrian forces led Napoleon to divide his own armies in the face of a numerically superior foe. Only the timely intervention of Gen. Louis Desaix—who was killed in the assault that cracked the Austrian lines—and the cavalry brigade of François-Étienne Kellermann would allow Napoleon to snatch victory from near disaster. The French imposed an armistice on the Austrians, forcing them to evacuate northern Italy west of the Mincio River. The Austrian collapse was made total with Gen. Victor Moreau’s triumph at Hohenlinden (December 3, 1800), which brought the court of Vienna to a state of despair.
On February 9, 1801, Joseph Bonaparte concluded with Austria the Treaty of Lunéville, whereby France regained all that it had won at Campo Formio. Much of this territory had been lost for a time during the War of the Second Coalition. Although Napoleon had agreed to recognize the independence of the Cisalpine, Ligurian, Helvetic and Batavian (Dutch) republics, these states were, in fact, little more than French puppets. Bonaparte meanwhile, had won the friendship of Paul of Russia, whose resentment against his former allies, Austria and England, facilitated a reordering of the Great Powers. The new Franco-Russian entente sparked the recreation of the League of Armed Neutrality, an alliance of Russia, Sweden, and Denmark that was initially established in 1780 during the American Revolution.
The Treaty of Amiens and the end of the war with Britain
The murder of Paul and the advent of the Anglophile tsar Alexander I brought about the dissolution of the League. The loss of his Russian ally and the surrender of French forces in Egypt to the British (August 30, 1801) disposed both Bonaparte and the British cabinet toward peace. He was seemingly invincible on land, they on the sea, and for the present each was powerless to harm the other. The Treaty of Amiens (March 27, 1802) was largely the result of exhaustion on both sides, and it would bring a 14-month pause to the fighting.
The specifications of the treaty were incredibly favorable to Napoleon. Great Britain restored to France almost the whole of the French overseas colonial empire, retaining only the Spanish island of Trinidad and the Dutch settlements in Ceylon. In exchange France recognized the Republic of the Seven Ionian Islands and agreed to evacuate Naples and the Papal States. Perhaps no event in the life of Bonaparte was more auspicious than the conclusion of this highly advantageous bargain. By retaining nearly all the continental conquests of France, and by recovering nearly every one of those which the British had made beyond the seas, he had effectively pacified Europe under his own terms.
The Concordat of 1801
Napoleon’s third great diplomatic victory during this period brought rapprochement with Rome. The Revolutionary Civil Constitution of the Clergy had led to a split in the Roman Catholic Church in France, and Pope Pius VI formally denounced the document in March 1791. Since that time, the French church had been split into two factions: a “constitutional” church served by bishops and priests who took the oath prescribed by the Constitution, and a “refractory” church whose bishops were mostly in exile and whose clergy—though some still worked in secret—had refused to conform. The papacy had anathematized the French church settlement and refused to consecrate any bishops under it.
Bonaparte was determined to enlist the clergy on the side of his regime. On his way back from Marengo in 1800 he made proposals to Pope Pius VII for a reconciliation of the papacy and the French church. After difficult negotiations, these took shape in the Concordat of 1801 and in supplementary documents by which Bonaparte attached, without the pope’s knowledge, so-called “organic articles,” strengthening the hold of the state over the church. From this time church and state worked in concert, and the exhortations of the bishops and clergy supported Napoleon and his officials in the raising of recruits, the payment of taxes, and the upholding of public order. There was even a catechism in which children were taught that “to honor and serve the Emperor is to honor and serve God himself” and that those who did not do so would “render themselves worthy of eternal damnation.” The Concordat not only gave Bonaparte the support of the clergy and their congregations, it also deprived the royalists of their chief argument and ally against his regime.
From consul for life to emperor
The consuls convened at Notre-Dame de Paris on Easter (April 18), 1802, to proclaim the Concordat. The first consul’s prestige was at its apex, and his political allies—at his suggestion—proposed that a “token of national gratitude” should be offered to him. In May 1802 it was decided that the French people should vote in referendum on the following question: “Shall Napoleon Bonaparte be consul for life?” France responded overwhelmingly in the affirmative, with the official results reflecting 3,568,885 votes being cast for the proposal and only 8,374 against it.
Napoleon then sent proposals for various changes in the constitution, which were at once registered by the Council of State and the Senate on August 4 (16 Thermidor), 1802. Besides holding his powers for life, he now gained the right of nominating his successor. He alone could ratify treaties of peace and alliance, and on his nomination 54 senators were added to the senate, which thereafter numbered 120 members appointed by him alone. This body received the right of deciding by decree all questions not provided for by the constitution; the legislature might also be dissolved at its bidding. In short, the First Consul now became the absolute ruler of France, governing the country through the ministry, the Council of State, and the Senate. The constitutional changes of August 1802, initiated solely by Bonaparte, made France an absolute monarchy. Napoleon’s grip on power was complete, and the ruling class had come to see him as indispensable. In April 1804 various government bodies agreed “that Napoleon Bonaparte be declared Emperor and that the imperial dignity be declared hereditary in his family.” The constitution of the year XII (May 1804), establishing the empire, was approved in a plebiscite by more than 3.5 million votes against about 2,500. It begins with the words “The government of the Republic is confided to an Emperor, who takes the title Emperor of the French.”
The coronation of Napoleon and the creation of an imperial court
The coronation of Napoleon as emperor of the French took place in Notre-Dame on December 2, 1804. The choice of this location was the first of many breaks with the traditional coronations of French kings. Most monarchs of France had been crowned at Reims Cathedral, northeast of Paris, but, because of that church’s association with the ancien régime, it was rejected as a venue. Napoleon had persuaded Pius VII to travel to Paris from the Vatican to officiate the coronation, a move that recalled Charlemagne, who was crowned by the pope in Rome in 800. After Pius blessed Napoleon and his wife, Joséphine, Napoleon ascended the steps to the altar. As the pope held up the crown, Napoleon famously took it from the pope’s hands and placed it on his own head. Napoleon then took the imperial diadem, turned to Joséphine, who knelt at his feet, and placed it on her head. This scene is famously captured in Jacques-Louis David’s monumental work The Coronation of Napoleon.
As emperor Napoleon spared no effort to patronize art and literature, to conciliate merchants and manufacturers, and to entertain the masses by providing food and work for the poor, by beautifying Paris with new streets and triumphal arches, by exhibiting pictures in the Louvre and captured banners at the Invalides, by holding reviews and by fêtes and fireworks. Napoleon also felt the need for a court aristocracy that would lend luster to his new image. He also reasoned that only by creating a new nobility based on merit could he displace and absorb the old nobility, which had lost its titles in 1790 but not its pretensions. The Napoleonic nobility would be an upper class based on a combination of service and wealth.
As happened at every stage of Napoleon’s advancement, the states tributary to France underwent changes corresponding to those occurring at Paris. The most important of these was the creation of a monarchy in North Italy. The Italian Republic (formerly the Cisalpine Republic) became the Kingdom of Italy. At first Napoleon desired to endow his brother Joseph, or, on his refusal, his brother Louis, with the crown of the new kingdom. They, however, refused to place themselves out of the line of direct succession in France, as Napoleon required, in case they accepted this new dignity. Finally, Napoleon resolved to take the title himself. On the May 26, 1805, Napoleon crowned himself in the cathedral at Milan with the Iron Crown of the old Lombard kings, amidst surroundings of the utmost splendor.
For five years after Marengo (June 1800–May 1805), Napoleon seldom left Paris and never traveled outside French territory. Over the subsequent nine years, however, one day out of every three was spent abroad campaigning. Napoleon was drawn into a fruitless pursuit of that complete control of the continental ports and capitals which would enable him to exclude English ships and subsidies from all Europe and to force London to accept terms of peace dictated from Paris.
Wars of the Empire
War of the Third Coalition (1805–06)
War with England had broken out again in May 1803. Napoleon thereupon intensified his preparations for the invasion of that country, and two years were spent in training an expeditionary force dubbed the Armée d’Angleterre (Army of England), building landing craft, and planning naval movements to obtain command of the Channel. By August 1805 it had become clear that a hasty dash across the Channel could not succeed in the face of Britain’s naval might, and the Armée d’Angleterre (now dubbed the Grande Armée) was diverted to the Rhine to deal with an Austrian army that had begun to mobilize. The British victory at the Battle of Trafalgar (October 21) put an end to Napoleon’s dreams of a cross-Channel amphibious assault.
With his plans against the British frustrated, Napoleon moved to strike the continental members of Third Coalition (Russia, Sweden, and Austria) before Russia could bring its forces to bear. A masterful campaign in Bavaria saw an entire Austrian army encircled and destroyed at the Battle of Ulm (October 19), and the French then moved to occupy Vienna (November 14). In what was perhaps Napoleon’s greatest military victory, he defeated the combined Austrian and Russian armies at Austerlitz on December 2. The Treaty of Pressburg (December 26, 1805) effectively put an end to the Holy Roman Empire and shattered Austrian influence in Germany.
War of the Fourth Coalition (1806–07)
On October 7, 1806, Prussia, which had missed its chance of intervening before Austerlitz, declared war and joined the remaining belligerents of the Third Coalition. This marked the creation of the Fourth Coalition against Napoleon. Within a week the main Prussian army under Charles William Ferdinand of Brunswick was destroyed at Jena and Auerstadt (October 14, 1806).
Russia remained, and checked Napoleon’s winter advance into Poland at Eylau (February 8, 1807). That spring Napoleon marched again, won a lucky victory at Friedland (June 14), and concluded with the emperor Alexander I the Treaty of Tilsit (July 7). Under the terms of the treaty, France and Russia became allies and divided Europe between them, reducing Austria and Prussia to helplessness. Napoleon’s hegemony in western and central Europe was thus established, and Russia was given a free hand to conquer Finland from Sweden. In a secret provision of the treaty, Alexander promised to join the Continental System against British trade if Britain rejected Russian mediation in its conflict with France.
Apex of the Empire
At this moment Napoleon had achieved all that he might reasonably expect: Italy reconquered, Austria weakened (but antagonized, and its power of recovery underestimated), and Prussia treated as a French dependency. Russia had been induced, by specious offers in the Near East, to close the Baltic to British shipping. This completed the Continental System, that retaliatory blockade which already extended from the Adriatic to the North Sea and was designed to exclude Great Britain’s exports and ruin its economy. The one gap in the circle was the Iberian Peninsula. Yet neither Spain nor Portugal offered so profitable a market for British goods as their possessions overseas, which were beyond Napoleon’s reach and were thrown open to England by his attack.
Napoleon could not bear to see Lisbon, Cádiz, and Gibraltar in the hands of the British navy, and he needed subsidies from Spain, his nominal ally. So he embarked in 1808 on the Peninsular War that dragged on for six years, absorbed about 300,000 of his best troops, and discredited his fame. An entire French army under Gen. Pierre Dupont capitulated at Bailén (July 23), Napoleon’s brother Joseph was chased from Madrid (August), and the defeated French army under Andoche Junot was conveyed from Portugal to France on British transports under the terms of the Convention of Cintra (August 30, 1808).
Napoleon’s own short visit to Spain at the end of 1808 was ended by the news that Austria, helped by British subsidies, was again arming. There followed the war of 1809, which began with a minor but brilliant victory at Eckmühl (April 22), a second occupation of Vienna (May 13), and a defeat at Aspern-Essling (May 21), and ended in a hard-won but decisive victory at Wagram (July 6). The Treaty of Schönbrunn the same year once more punished Austria without disabling it.
Napoleon thought he had secured the emperor Francis’s support when in the spring of 1810, having divorced Joséphine, he married Francis’s daughter, the archduchess Marie Louise, in the hope that she would give him a son and heir to continue his dynasty. A year later (March 20, 1811) their son Napoléon-François-Charles-Joseph, who was styled as the king of Rome, was born. Once more Napoleon seemed to be at a summit of power. The agreement of Tilsit, however, though reaffirmed at the Conference of Erfurt a year later (October 12, 1808), was breaking down under the pressure of the Continental System, which deprived Russia of British goods without giving it any compensation in French markets. The tsar resented the continued presence of French troops in Prussia and feared Napoleon’s designs on Poland, and Napoleon remained apprehensive that Russia might support a fresh rearming of Austria.
Moreover Napoleon’s imperial claims, not those of an individual any longer but those of a dynasty, more than ever offended the Habsburgs and the Hohenzollerns, not to mention the deposed kings of Spain and Naples and the tributary princes of Germany. Meanwhile, his appeals to the precedent of Charlemagne embittered his relations with the papacy. The war with Russia upon which Napoleon now embarked (1812) was the expression of a state of mind that had been growing upon him for 10 years, belief in war as a more effective argument than diplomacy, and the desire to destroy a rival power disguised as a crusade to liberate Poland and rid Europe of the threat of a “barbarian invasion.”
The fall of Napoleon
With the retreat from Moscow the Napoleonic edifice came toppling down. The defection of Prussia from the French alliance enabled the Russians to seize in turn the lines of the Neman, Vistula, and Elbe. The tributary states of western Germany only waited for a safe moment to declare against their “liberator.” Austria, for whom Metternich (priding himself on being the one man able to outwit Napoleon) had through five years of planning prepared just this opportunity for revenge, at last threw its armies into the fight. Even Bernadotte, now prince royal of Sweden, turned against his old commander. At Leipzig (October 18, 1813) Napoleon’s hastily recruited second army was surrounded and destroyed, and the remnants were driven across the Rhine. Peace talks at Châtillon (February 1814) came to nothing. Napoleon’s third army, striking right and left against the allied invaders, was put out of action by the surrender of Paris (March 30, 1814), and Napoleon signed his first abdication at Fontainebleau on April 11.
His defeat was the result not merely of military failure—though that was what hurt him most—but of the damaging effect of his economic policy, which had sacrificed French commerce to the attempt to destroy British trade, and the industries of his allies to the promotion of those of France; to the burden of requisitioning, recruiting, and taxation imposed upon every country that he had conquered or “liberated”; to the five years’ imprisonment and bullying of Pius VII, which sacrificed the benefits won by the Concordat; and to the war weariness and disillusionment of the mass of the French people, who showed no enthusiasm either for national defense in 1814 or for a Napoleonic restoration in 1815.
The First Bourbon Restoration and the Hundred Days
With the return of the Bourbons in the person of Louis XVIII, a brother of Louis XVI, the Revolution came back to its starting point, and France received the constitutional monarchy based upon the bourgeois predominance that it had desired in 1789. The charter of June 4, 1814, established a bicameral parliamentary system after the English model. The king was to appoint ministers, to convene and, when occasion arose, to adjourn or to dissolve the chamber of deputies and to sanction legislation passed by it and by the chamber of peers.
The Hundred Days were an anticlimax, for the Napoleon who returned from Elba in March 1815 had lost the magic of victory. The veterans of the Grande Armée came to his call, but many of his generals refused to take up arms against what they had recognized as the legitimate government. The clergy were content under a Bourbon king. The merchants hated the idea of another war. The constitutionalists suspected that a victory in the field would be followed by a restoration of the empire. As soon as the allies, who were still arguing with one another at the Congress of Vienna, heard of his return and of the flight of Louis XVIII, they acted with unexpected promptness and unanimity, declaring that Napoleon “had placed himself outside the pale” of society and recalling their armies for a fresh invasion of France.
Napoleon struck first at Brussels, in front of which a Prussian army under Gebhard Leberecht von Blücher and a mixed British, German, and Dutch-Belgian army under Wellington were caught almost unprepared. The Prussians retreated from Ligny and the British from Quatre Bras. Napoleon pressed on, but not quickly enough, being confident of isolating and destroying Wellington. At Waterloo (June 18) he met with such stubborn resistance that Blücher was able to come up in time to turn a defeat into a rout. The First French Empire came to a close with Napoleon’s second abdication four days later; on July 8 Louis XVIII entered again into his capital.