history of Ecuador

Liberal-Conservative hostilities

An increasing rivalry and ideological differences between the Sierra and the Costa usually focused on the two leading cities: Quito, the capital, in the Sierra, and Guayaquil, the country’s principal port, in the Costa. Quito was the home of a landed aristocracy whose positions of power during this early period were based on large semifeudal estates worked by Indigenous labor; it was (and to some extent has remained) a conservative clerical city, resistant to changes in the status quo. Guayaquil, on the other hand, by the 19th century had become a bustling cosmopolitan port, controlled by a few wealthy merchants. These men and those around them were influenced by 19th-century liberalism; interested in trade, they favored free enterprise and expanding markets, and some were anticlerical. Their bourgeois attitudes conflicted sharply with the more aristocratic beliefs of the Sierra elites. These early rivalries tended to be exacerbated by the nature of the two cities. The people of Guayaquil, the country’s breadwinner and the home of Ecuador’s industry and trade, felt that a disproportionate part of the state’s tax income was spent in Quito by government bureaucrats. Those in Quito complained that their exports had to pass through the monopolistic bottleneck of Guayaquil, which acted as a traditional middleman and, by adding to the price of Sierra products, reduced their competitiveness in the world market.

Rivalry between Flores and Rocafuerte (1830–45)

Ambitious generals and politicians have played on this Quito-Guayaquil rivalry since the foundation of the republic in 1830. During the period 1830–45 two leaders from the wars of independence—Juan José Flores and Vicente Rocafuerte—struggled for power; Flores found much of his support in Quito, Rocafuerte in Guayaquil. Hostility was not constant, and for a few years the rivals agreed to alternate in the presidency. They were not simply personalist dictators; Rocafuerte in particular had a coherent ideology of government and did much to improve the educational institutions of the main cities. Both, however, were capable of deplorable conduct in their efforts to retain or regain power. Flores, on one occasion, even invited the Spaniards to return.

Breakdown of national government (1845–60)

The rivalry between Flores and Rocafuerte was a struggle between two strong leaders. Between 1845 and 1860, however, the country went through a period of chaos in which a series of squabbling, weak leaders (usually self-proclaimed liberals) fought for the presidency. This period reinforced the already close ties between the military and the national government.

The regime of García Moreno (1860–75)

In the next period (1860–75) one of Latin America’s most extraordinary experiments in autocracy occurred, during the presidency of Gabriel García Moreno. As a young man, García Moreno had witnessed the chaos in Ecuador and the selfish struggles of the various cliques. He had also seen the European Revolutions of 1848 and had developed an abhorrence of liberalism and of uncontrolled violence. A careful analysis of Ecuadoran society led him to conclude that the young country lacked unifying factors: it had no great tradition, suffered from regional resentments, and was sharply divided by class and between Europeans and Indigenous people who did not even share a common language. García Moreno concluded that the only social cement was religion—the general adherence of the population to Roman Catholicism. He thought that in time nationalism could be created and more social cohesion would emerge as a result but that meanwhile Ecuador needed a period of peace and strong government. When he became president, therefore, he based his regime on two factors: strong authoritarian personal rule and the Roman Catholic Church. He established the Conservative Party (Partido Conservador; PC), which promoted a powerful central government and a strong connection between church and state. All education and welfare, along with the direction of much government policy, were turned over to clerics. Other religions were harshly discouraged. All opposition was ruthlessly suppressed, and some leading liberals spent many years in exile.

Although many aspects of García Moreno’s regime were reactive, it did mark the first period of genuine progress for Ecuador. Roads, schools, and hospitals were built. A start was made on a Quito-Guayaquil railroad, to tie together the Sierra and the Costa. García Moreno encouraged the planting of eucalyptus trees from Australia to combat erosion in the Sierra, where the original ground cover had been cut down for fuel by the impoverished Indigenous people. Other agricultural reforms slowly raised production. By the end of his regime a strong feeling of nationalism had been created among the urban classes.

In the 19th century, however, this authoritarian, clerical government seemed an anachronism, and liberal opposition grew both at home and abroad. When García Moreno was assassinated on the steps of the government palace in 1875, the liberal intellectual and pamphleteer Juan Montalvo proclaimed from exile, “My pen has killed him.”

Shift to liberalism (1875–97)

García Moreno’s death, as he himself might have forecast, brought a period of near anarchy. Conservatives and liberals struggled for power. But Ecuador had become part of the world market; the importance of the coast slowly increased, and the liberals of that area increasingly dominated the economy.

A new liberal hero emerged from the lower classes as the leader of the coastal reaction to Sierra conservatism and clericalism. A man of great personal magnetism, Gen. Eloy Alfaro led a march against the Sierra in 1895 and after a year became constitutional president, serving two terms (1897–1901 and 1906–11). Much of the administrative structure of the García Moreno era was dismantled. The anticlerical liberals, proclaiming themselves the Radical Liberal Party (Partido Liberal Radical; PLR), gradually removed the church from state education: they instituted civil marriage and burial, proclaimed freedom of religion, permitted divorce, and eased controls on the press. The church’s tithe was abolished, and many of its large estates were confiscated by the state, some estates passing into the hands of liberal leaders.

In many ways, however, in spite of political manifestos to the contrary, the liberals of this era shared the basic ideas of the previous period. They advanced García Moreno’s road- and railroad-building programs; the Quito-Guayaquil railroad was completed in 1908, during Alfaro’s second term. Moreover, central government did not lose its authoritarian caste; Alfaro, the liberal caudillo (dictator), was as arbitrary and ruthless as his conservative predecessor. In the Sierra and on the coast, power remained unchanged. The problem of the great haciendas was not touched, and the change to liberalism meant little to the impoverished Indigenous people and peasants.

Alfaro’s overthrow, like that of García Moreno, was brought about by his stubborn attempts to perpetuate himself in office. A coalition of conservatives and dissident liberals forced him and his clique from the presidency in August 1911, but, when the next president died in office shortly thereafter, the aging and increasingly unpopular Alfaro returned from exile and tried to recapture his following. The leaders of the liberals rejected him, and, after some fighting, he was arrested in Guayaquil. He and his lieutenants were sent to a model prison in Quito, built years before by García Moreno. There, on January 28, 1912, a lynch mob broke in, dragged the prisoners through the streets, and burned their bodies.

Problems of the early 20th century

The liberals remained in office, but the real power continued to rest in the hands of the wealthy merchants and bankers of Guayaquil. During World War I and the short boom that followed it, this clique further extended its influence and diversified its capital with a view to controlling the agriculture of the coastal plain. Cacao was the dominant export crop, as in the colonial period, but sugar and rice became increasingly important.

A depression followed in the early 1920s. The price of food increased, and exports in general declined. The sucre—the national unit of currency—fell rapidly in value. At the same time, the country’s cacao plantations became infected with a fungus that causes a malformation known as witches’-broom, and production sagged. These crises brought urban discontent, the formation of trade unions in Guayaquil, riots, and massacres by the army. Hundreds died during riots and shootings in November 1922.

In 1925 the army entered this turbulent situation, claiming that it wished to restore national unity and blaming many of the country’s problems on the merchant bankers of Guayaquil. Unfortunately, the 1925 revolution brought little change to Ecuador’s social and economic structures.

Economic development and loss of territory in the 1940s

Ecuador was still suffering from the effects of the Great Depression when it became involved in World War II. It sided with the Allies and allowed the United States to build military bases on its territory, but it played little direct part in the war. Under Pres. Carlos Arroyo del Río, Ecuador drew some benefit from the higher prices for raw materials caused by the war, and the early years of the war were relatively prosperous and tranquil.

World War II had a serious secondary effect on the country, however. The large Amazonian territories claimed by Ecuador had never been effectively controlled by the government; much of the area was occupied by Indigenous groups. Dating back to the 16th century, Peruvians had increasingly settled along the Amazon and its tributaries. In July 1941, after long diplomatic bickering and a series of border incidents, the Peruvian army invaded, seized much of the disputed Amazonian area, and devastated El Oro provincia (province). The Ecuadoran forces, poorly trained and equipped, were easily defeated, and the disgrace caused the overthrow of Arroyo del Río. The United States and the other major powers were too preoccupied with World War II to allow such small conflicts to destroy Allied unity or to disrupt the production of vital raw materials. A peace conference in Rio de Janeiro in 1942 forced Ecuador to relinquish its claims to much of the Amazonian region. Subsequently, Ecuador repeatedly attempted to reopen the question, claiming that the Protocol of Rio did not establish precise borders and that the new borders were therefore invalid. This constant irredentism was used repeatedly by demagogues and ultranationalists, who distracted attention and effort from urgent internal problems.

Domination of Velasco Ibarra after World War II

Politics and government after World War II presented contradictions. Ecuador enjoyed a long period of constitutional government and relatively free elections following the presidency of the PLR leader Galo Plaza (1948–52). There were also two long interludes of military government (1963–66; 1972–79), but the period was dominated by one of Latin America’s great caudillos, José María Velasco Ibarra. Velasco Ibarra, who died in 1979, was president of Ecuador five times but completed only one of these terms. He seemed able to win any election, such was his popularity with the masses, but his terms of office were marked by sudden reversals in policy, contradictory economic programs, personal outbursts, temporary suspensions of civil liberties, and military interventions. Some critics claimed that Velasco Ibarra drew support from communist groups; others said he was the puppet of powerful business groups in Guayaquil. But neither these nor other groups were able to control the erratic Velasco Ibarra for long.

His political presence may have inhibited the development of coherent political parties and programs for changing the country’s antiquated social and economic structure, but his personal appeal cut across parties and ideologies. The traditional parties—the PLR and the PC—were thrown into disarray by his incursions, and the growth of newer parties, such as the Ecuadoran Socialists and the Social Christians, was retarded. Opponents alleged that Velasco Ibarra made economic progress impossible because constructive measures undertaken by previous governments were halted or reversed by the Velasco Ibarra interludes.

Ecuador from the late 20th century

After Velasco Ibarra’s last fall from power, in 1972, military officers ruled for some seven years before handing over the government to a constitutionally elected (July 16, 1979) civilian president. The civilian and military governments of the 1970s had not developed a firm policy for dealing with the oil boom that occurred in that decade. The boom increased the size and wealth of the middle class, led to the building of roads, quays, pipelines, and other infrastructure, and caused severe inflation. No basic structural reforms took place, however, and the poor suffered the effects of inflation but reaped few of the benefits of the oil boom.

Velasco Ibarra’s death and the withdrawal of the military officers from government allowed the country to return to an elected civilian government and a new constitution in 1979. Jaime Roldós Aguilera, a young social democrat, was elected president on a reformist platform. He promised greater social equality and a more equitable distribution of oil industry profits, but he was unable to manage the legislature and was soon at odds with his own party, the Concentration of Popular Forces. His popularity increased after a border skirmish with Peru in early 1981, but he was killed in an airplane crash later that year. His successor was Osvaldo Hurtado Larrea of the small Christian Democratic party. The economy, depressed by the drop in world oil prices, spiraled downward with accompanying high inflation and a depreciating currency.

León Febres Cordero, a congressman from Guayaquil, was elected president in 1984. His free-market economics and pro-U.S. foreign policy drew Ecuador into closer alliance with the U.S. administration of Pres. Ronald Reagan, but Febres Cordero was never popular in Ecuador. Oil prices continued to fall, and his troubles with the National Congress and the military led to calls for his resignation and, on one occasion, to his being kidnapped by air force personnel for half a day, until he agreed to release one of their leaders. In March 1987 he suspended interest payments on Ecuador’s $8.3 billion foreign debt after an earthquake destroyed part of a major oil pipeline.

Left-wing opponent Rodrigo Borja Cevallos was elected to the presidency in 1988, but he seemed to have few solutions to the steadily worsening economic crisis. His term was marked by a major national uprising in 1990, with Indigenous groups demonstrating in favor of such issues as land reform; the uprising and subsequent protests pushed the Ecuadoran government to recognize the land rights of these Indigenous groups and address their other concerns.

In 1992 Sixto Durán Ballén was elected president. He brought the government budget into balance, reduced trade barriers, brought Ecuador into the World Trade Organization, and encouraged foreign investment. The benefits of his accomplishments, however, were somewhat offset by conflict: in early 1995, the long-simmering boundary dispute with Peru erupted in a border war, leading to a standoff that persisted until a peace accord was signed on October 26, 1998. The country was left with a crippling war debt.

From the mid-1990s to the early 21st century, Ecuador experienced several years of political upheaval, during which time many individuals served as president. Populist leader Abdalá Bucaram Ortíz was elected president in 1996; however, he became increasingly unpopular because of his erratic and controversial behavior, and in early 1997 Congress removed him from office and replaced him with Fabián Alarcón Rivera. In elections held in 1998, Quito mayor Jamil Mahuad Witt was elected president. Early in his term, Mahuad was confronted with a serious economic crisis that peaked in 1999. His unpopular austerity measures, implemented to address the crisis, and high rates of inflation resulted in public demonstrations against his leadership. In 2000 Mahuad made perhaps his most unpopular decision—to adopt the U.S. dollar as Ecuador’s currency. This proposal proved to be his undoing, and shortly thereafter he was removed from the presidency in a coup engineered by Indigenous leaders and some members of the military, including Col. Lucio Gutiérrez Borbua. The coup leaders eventually agreed to let Vice Pres. Gustavo Noboa Bejerano ascend to the presidency, which effectively ended the coup. Noboa followed through with Mahuad’s decision to convert Ecuador’s currency to the dollar, despite the plan’s unpopularity. However, this conversion, as well as a rise in oil prices, helped stabilize the economy in 2001.

The beginning of the 21st century found Ecuador struggling with many of the same issues as in previous decades: political upheaval, social unrest due to dissatisfaction with Indigenous rights and economic policies, and poor economic performance. Former coup leader Gutiérrez stood in the 2002 presidential elections and won, taking office in 2003. He made some attempts at economic reform, but he did not have the cooperation of the National Congress and was initially limited in his success. Gutiérrez was removed from office in April 2005 and replaced with Vice Pres. Alfredo Palacio.

Rafael Correa was elected president in November 2006 as an independent leftist, with oil policy, poverty, debt, and relations with the United States as the main campaign issues. Correa, an ally of populist Venezuelan Pres. Hugo Chávez and other left-leaning leaders, strengthened state control over the country’s extensive oil resources, increased spending on social programs, and diminished ties to U.S. development organizations. In early 2008 he broke off diplomatic relations with Colombia after that country’s forces raided a guerrilla camp inside Ecuador. Correa also received support from the majority of voters for his plan to devise a new constitution to fight long-standing corruption in Ecuador’s National Congress.

A draft constitution was approved by a special Constituent Assembly in July 2008, and more than 60 percent of Ecuadoran voters backed the new constitution in a referendum held in September. When the constitution entered into force in October 2008, the Constituent Assembly assumed the duties of the legislative branch, pending the election of the new National Assembly outlined in the constitution. The new constitution was the 20th since the country gained independence in 1830, and it reflected many of Correa’s leftist ideals, including a ban on foreign military bases, the allowance of same-sex marriage, free education through the college level, social security benefits for unpaid domestic workers, and greater national control over the oil and mining industries. Moreover, it gave broad powers to the president and, most notably, allowed the president to serve up to two consecutive four-year terms. Critics of the new constitution accused Correa of giving the government too much control and aligning himself too much with Chávez. Correa won another four-year term, receiving more than 50 percent of the vote in the April 2009 presidential elections (it was ruled that his tenure in office prior to the promulgation of the new constitution did not count as a term under that document). In July the newly elected National Assembly convened for its first session.

Correa’s hold on power was threatened on September 30, 2010, when factions of the military and the national police—responding to the president’s austerity measures in general and to cuts in benefits for public servants in particular—staged protests that escalated into a virtual coup attempt. Correa was addressing protesting police when he was injured by tear gas and taken to a hospital that was quickly besieged by police. He was rescued by the military (whose leadership remained loyal) and returned to the presidential palace as order was restored. By May 2011 Correa was firmly back in control, his presidential powers having been extended by approval of a 10-issue referendum that included authorization for him to appoint a commission to overhaul the judicial system and to direct the National Assembly to form a commission (reporting to him) that would regulate media content.

In August 2012 Ecuador granted political asylum to Julian Assange, the Australian founder of WikiLeaks, who had been living under Ecuador’s protection in its embassy in London since June, having exhausted appeals under the British legal system to avoid extradition to Sweden on sexual assault charges.

Correa secured another term as president in February 2013, when he was reelected in a landslide, capturing nearly 58 percent of the popular vote, a margin of more than 30 percent over the next closest competitor in a field of eight major candidates.

In 2014 a new crescendo was reached in a long ongoing legal battle that had led an Ecuadoran judge in 2011 to order the Chevron Corporation to pay $18.2 billion for environmental damage done to the Amazonian Lake Agrio region where oil producer Texaco (taken over by Chevron in 2001) had been active. The Ecuadoran Supreme Court upheld this judgment in 2012 (though it reduced the compensation for the Amazonian residents to $9.5 billion); however, Chevron won several subsequent legal victories in its bid to avoid paying compensation, most notably the March 2014 decision by a U.S. court that found that the Amazonian plaintiffs’ legal team (led by an American lawyer) had used “fraudulent evidence” and paid bribes to obtain its favorable rulings in the Ecuadoran courts. The balance in the battle shifted again in Ecuador’s favor in September 2015 when the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Ecuador could use the Canadian legal system to pursue redress from Chevron.

In the first half of 2015, Ecuadorans repeatedly took to the streets en masse to protest Correa’s government’s proposal to impose an inheritance tax of 77.5 percent and a real-estate capital gains tax of 75 percent. Protests were also more broadly aimed at what many Ecuadorans saw as the dictatorial style of Correa, whose popularity waned as his government’s largesse was reined in as a result of dramatically declining oil revenues. Correa withdrew the tax proposals in advance of Pope Francis I’s visit to Ecuador in early July.

In December 2015, however, the National Assembly, controlled by Correa’s party, adopted 15 amendments to the constitution, including the removal of term limits for public office as of 2021, paving the way for Correa to seek reelection indefinitely. The changes to the constitution, which prompted a new round of street protests, also included the classification of communications as a “public service,” allowing the government to further extend the control of the media that it had begun to exert in the previous few years.

A magnitude-7.8 earthquake that shook the Pacific coast of Ecuador on April 16, 2016, caused widespread destruction and hundreds of deaths in the northwestern part of the country. The quake was centered about 17 miles (27 km) south-southeast of Muisne and roughly 100 miles (160 km) west of Quito. It was the worst such event in decades—recalling the powerful earthquake that hit the coast of Ecuador and Colombia in 1979 and sparked a tsunami that took more than 600 lives and the 1987 earthquake in which more than 1,000 individuals died.

After growing at an average rate of about 4 percent per year between 2006 and 2014, gross domestic product (GDP) in Ecuador bottomed out in 2015 as the toll taken by falling world oil prices fully hit home. In 2016 the Ecuadoran GDP contracted by some 1.7 percent. In the process, government revenue shrunk from about $25 billion to about $11 billion. With his ability to finance popular social programs critically impaired and his popularity further eroded by scandal (including billions of dollars in bribes allegedly paid to Ecuadoran government officials by the Brazilian construction firm Odebrecht), Correa opted not to run for reelection in 2017. He threw his support to Lenín Moreno, who had served as his vice president from 2007 to 2013.

Moreno was the winner of the first round of voting in February 2017 but was unable to preclude a runoff by failing to capture the majority of the total vote and falling just short of obtaining 40 percent of the vote plus a 10 percent or greater victory margin that would also have eliminated the need for a second round of voting. For the first time in recent Ecuadoran history, authorities were not able to declare a winner on election night. As the count continued two days after voting (owing ostensibly to delays in the arrival of the vote from rural districts and abroad), supporters of second-place finisher Guillermo Lasso, suspecting fraud, took to the streets to demand confirmation of a second round of balloting. When that confirmation came, Lasso—who had promised corporate tax cuts, job creation through foreign investment, and the end to Ecuadoran protection for Assange—appeared to be well positioned to benefit from the support of other runner-up candidates heading into the April runoff election.

Lasso and his supporters again cried fraud when Moreno was declared the winner in the runoff election held on April 2. Moreno captured just over 51 percent of the vote to almost 49 percent for Lasso. However, a prominent exit poll had indicated that Lasso would be the winner, and he had already claimed victory when the National Electoral Council announced Moreno (projected as the victor in a different exit poll) as the winner. Lasso demanded a recount, and his supporters angrily took to the streets again to protest the results.

Nonetheless, Moreno took office and surprised many observers when he began reversing some of Correa’s policies rather than preserving the status quo in anticipation of Correa seeking to return to office in 2021. Moreover, Moreno pushed for a referendum that would limit Ecuadoran presidents to two terms. An outraged Correa campaigned against the referendum, but on February 4, 2018, voters approved it by roughly a two-to-one margin, thus preventing Correa from ever running for the presidency again.

In April 2019 Ecuador revoked the asylum it had granted Assange. It allowed British police to enter the Ecuadoran embassy in London after securing a written agreement from the British government that Assange “would not be extradited to a country where he could face torture or the death penalty.” President Moreno indicated that the decision to allow Assange’s arrest came in response to “his repeated violations to international conventions and daily-life protocols.”

In March 2019 the International Monetary Fund (IMF) finalized a $4.2 billion loan for Ecuador that would support the Moreno government’s economic policies over the next three years. That agreement was predicated on the contingency that Ecuador adopt austerity measures to bring stability to the country’s finances. When Moreno made a dramatic step in that direction in early October by eliminating a fuel subsidy that had been in place for some 40 years, protests erupted throughout the country and quickly turned violent, especially in Quito. Indigenous groups and transportation workers played a major role in the protests, which escalated into running battles with security forces, persisted over a number of days, and forced Moreno to temporarily transfer the government to the coastal city of Guayaquil. After Moreno rescinded the presidential decree that had eliminated the fuel subsidies, the government returned to Quito.

As his term continued, Moreno continued to pursue a largely business-friendly agenda. Early 2020 brought the onset of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic, which hit Ecuador early and hard, beginning with an outbreak in Guayaquil, which quickly became one of the first and worst-hit hot spots in Latin America. The government sought to contain the potentially deadly virus by imposing stringent lockdowns, but the country’s health care system was severely challenged, and the economy took a major hit as GDP tumbled by 7.8 percent in 2020, according to the Ecuadoran Central Bank. Facing a huge public financing deficit, Moreno imposed $4 billion in public spending cuts in May 2020. That month the country also defaulted selectively on its debt. By July Moreno’s government had restructured its debt, and in September it obtained access to some $6.5 billion from the IMF to shore up the economy as Ecuador continued to battle the spread of the virus and the disease caused by it, COVID-19, which would claim more than 20,000 lives by the beginning of June 2021.

The field for the 2021 presidential election again included Lasso, who had supported Moreno’s efforts during the previous four years and pledged to advance the IMF loan program and austerity. The Correa-endorsed Andrés Arauz headed the Union for Hope (Unión por la Esperanza; UNES) ticket; Yaku Pérez represented the Indigenous Pachakutik party; and political outsider Xavier Hervas was the candidate of the Democratic Left (Izquierda Democrática; ID) party. In the first round of voting, in February 2021, none of the candidates received enough support to preclude a runoff, but Arauz, who tallied 32.7 percent of the vote, and Lasso, who captured 19.7 percent, advanced to the second round. Pérez, who took 19.4 percent of the vote to be just edged out by Lasso, claimed that the election had been compromised by fraud, but he was denied a recount. Hervas secured 15.7 percent of the vote, which, taken with Pérez’s share, meant that more than one-third of the voters had rejected both Lasso’s neoliberal approach and Arauz’s return to the policies of Correa.

In the elections for the 137-seat National Assembly, no party succeeded in obtaining a majority. The Union for Hope secured the largest presence, with 49 seats; followed by Pachakutik, with 27 seats; the Democratic Left and the Social Christian Party (Partido Social Cristiano; PSC), with 19 seats each; and Lasso’s Creating Opportunities (Creando Oportunidades; CREO) party, with 12 seats. The big loser was Moreno’s PAIS Alliance, which fell from 74 seats in the previous Assembly to none in the newly elected body. Lasso triumphed in the April presidential runoff by winning 52.5 percent of the vote, compared with 47.5 percent for Arauz. However, more than 18 percent of the ballots cast were purposely spoiled as a protest vote at the behest of Pérez and the country’s largest Indigenous organization, the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador (Confederación de Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador; CONAIE). Moreover, roughly one-fifth of voters abstained from voting altogether despite the mandatory nature of voting in Ecuadoran elections.

From the outset of his tenure as president, Lasso banged heads with the legislature in his attempts to advance a business-friendly agenda. Meanwhile, violence, gang activity, and crime were on the rise in Ecuador as Mexican, Colombian, and Balkan drug cartels made the country a focus of their efforts to transport cocaine produced in Peru and Colombia. In May 2023 the National Assembly heated up its effort to impeach Lasso, who was accused of having been aware of and ignoring irregularities in a contract between a private company and Flota Petrolera Ecuatoriana, the state-run oil transport company, which resulted in large financial losses for the government. To stave off impeachment, Lasso exploited a measure that had been added to the Ecuadoran constitution in 2008 that allowed him to dissolve the legislature and set the stage for new elections. In the meantime, he continued to govern, albeit with circumscribed powers—allowed to address only economic and administrative matters, subject to oversight by the Constitutional Court.

The August 9, 2023, assassination of presidential candidate Fernando Villavicencio—a journalist and onetime legislator who had crusaded against corruption, organized crime, and human rights violations—pushed already heightened concerns about security to the top of voters’ minds when they went to the polls on August 20. Luisa González, a leftist lawyer and the handpicked candidate of Correa, finished first in the contest to complete Lasso’s presidential term by capturing about 34 percent of the vote. The surprising second-place finisher in the large field, 35-year-old Daniel Noboa, claimed some 23 percent of the vote and is the son of one of the country’s wealthiest individuals, Álvaro Noboa, a banana magnate who himself had run unsuccessfully for the presidency five times. Daniel Noboa beat González in a runoff election in October—tallying about 52 percent of the vote, compared with some 48 percent for González—to earn the opportunity to finish Lasso’s term, which runs through May 2025.